Men's Army Trouser without Braid, Shade 451

The delivery ratings found on page 33 of the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation are hereby corrected to the following: (1) Technical Evaluation Offerors are required to submit technical proposals as prescribed in the Special Instructions for the Submission of Source Selection Proposal Information in section L of this solicitation. Each technical proposal will be evaluated against the technical factors specified in Sections M. After technical evaluation, each proposal will be rated and categorized as cited in Section M. Proposals so technically deficient as to make them technically unacceptable will be rejected as unacceptable, regardless of the cost or price offered. No discussions will be held with rejected offerors, nor will any rejected offeror be given an opportunity to revise its offer to correct those deficiencies in order to become satisfactory after date and time set for receipt of initial offers. (a) Rating Definitions: •1. BEST DELIVERY SCHEDULE 1 st Evaluation Factor •· Outstanding - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal contains multiple strengths and no deficiencies. The offeror has proposed an initial delivery date for delivery 1 shorter than the suggested 120 days after approval of Pre-Production Samples if requested, and will deliver the entire contract quantity of 70,000 for Lot 0001 or 50,000 for Lot 0002 prior to the suggested 390 days. The offeror has fully completed the delivery schedule table as required. •· Good - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains at least one strength and no deficiencies. The offeror has proposed either an initial delivery date for delivery 1 shorter than the suggested 120 days after approval of Pre-Production Samples if requested, OR will deliver the entire contract quantity of 70,000 for Lot 0001 or 50,000 for Lot 0002 prior to the suggested 390 days. The offeror has fully completed the delivery schedule table as required. •· Acceptable - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal has no strength and no deficiencies. The offeror has proposed delivery that meets the suggested delivery time frame of 120 days after approval of Pre-Production Samples if requested, and will deliver the entire contract quantity of 70,000 for Lot 0001 or 50,000 for Lot 0002 within the suggested 390 days. The offeror has fully completed the delivery schedule table as required. •· Marginal - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal has no strength and one deficiency. The offeror has proposed delivery that does not meet the suggested delivery time frame of 120 days after approval of Pre-Production Samples if requested, but will deliver the entire contract quantity of 70,000 for Lot 0001 or 50,000 for Lot 0002 within the suggested 390 days. The offeror has fully completed the delivery schedule table as required. •· Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies and is not awardable. Offer DOES NOT provide a completed delivery schedule table as required.